FIFOs
To understand the differences between dumb and FIFO (First In, First Out queue discipline) first let's examine what happens when a UART has sent or received a byte. The UART itself can't do anything with the data passing thru it, it just receives and sends it. For the obsolete dumb UARTS, the CPU gets an interrupt from the serial device every time a byte has been sent or received. The CPU then moves the received byte out of the UART's buffer and into memory somewhere, or gives the UART another byte to send. The obsolete 8250 and 16450 UARTs only have a 1 byte buffer. That means, that every time 1 byte is sent or received, the CPU is interrupted. At low transfer rates, this is OK. But, at high transfer rates, the CPU gets so busy dealing with the UART, that is doesn't have time to adequately tend to other tasks. In some cases, the CPU does not get around to servicing the interrupt in time, and the byte is overwritten, because they are coming in so fast. This is called an "overrun" or "overflow".
FIFO UARTs help solve this problem. The 16550A (or 16550) FIFO chip comes with 16 byte FIFO buffers. This means that it can receive up to 14 bytes (or send 16 bytes) before it has to interrupt the CPU. Not only can it wait for more bytes, but the CPU then can transfer all (14 to 16) bytes at a time. This is a significant advantage over the obsolete UARTs, which only had 1 byte buffers. The CPU receives less interrupts, and is free to do other things. Data is rarely lost. Note that the interrupt threshold of FIFO buffers (trigger level) may be set at less than 14. 1, 4 and 8 are other possible choices. As of late 2000 there was no way the Linux user could set these directly (setserial can't do it). While many PC's only have a 16550 with 16-byte buffers, better UARTS have even larger buffers.
Note that the interrupt is issued slightly before the buffer gets full (at say a "trigger level" of 14 bytes for a 16-byte buffer). This allows room for a couple more bytes to be received before the interrupt service routine is able to actually fetch all these bytes. The trigger level may be set to various permitted values by kernel software. A trigger level of 1 will be almost like an obsolete UART (except that it still has room for 15 more bytes after it issues the interrupt).
Now consider the case where you're on the Internet. It's just sent you a short webpage of text. All of this came in thru the serial port. If you had a 16-byte buffer on the serial port which held back characters until it had 14 of them, some of the last several characters on the screen might be missing as the FIFO buffer waited to get the 14th character. But the 14th character doesn't arrive since you've been sent the entire page (over the phone line) and there are no more characters to send to you. It could be that these last characters are part of the HTML formatting, etc. and are not characters to display on the screen but you don't want to lose format either.
There is a "timeout" to prevent the above problem. The "timeout" works like this for the receive UART buffer: If characters arrive one after another, then an interrupt is issued only when say the 14th character reaches the buffer. But if a character arrives and the next character doesn't arrive soon thereafter, then an interrupt is issued anyway. This results in fetching all of the characters in the FIFO buffer, even if only a few (or only one) are present. There is also "timeout" for the transmit buffer as well
Why FIFO Buffers are Small
You may wonder why the FIFO buffers are not larger. After all, memory is cheap and it wouldn't cost much more to use buffers in the kilo-byte range. The reason is flow control. Flow control stops the flow of data (bytes) on serial line when necessary. If a stop signal is sent to serial port, then the stop request is handled by software (even if the flow control is "hardware"). The serial port hardware knows nothing about flow control.
If the serial port buffer contains 64 bytes ready to send when it receives a flow control signal to stop sending, it will send out the 64 bytes anyway in violation of the stop request. There is no stopping it since it doesn't know about flow control. If the buffer was large, then many more bytes would be sent in violation of flow control's request to stop.
0 comments:
Post a Comment